Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
CPDA - Education is a right by delatorre-politik CPDA - Education is a right by delatorre-politik
Education is a right.

La educación es un derecho.
Add a Comment:
 
:iconsolitairemarauder:
SolitaireMarauder Featured By Owner Sep 30, 2013
No matter how much you rant on your Protestant logic. Education NEEDS to be free. That a person born in the middle class or lower classes should work hard for something that others had simply because their fathers or granfathers worked hard is completely and absolutely ridiculous think of it objectively. Im not saying that working is bad, but depends on working for studyng adds an unnecesary amount of stress that could be very bad for either the psyche or the nerve system of the student. Why? His skills once finished would benefit society, and ultimately humanity, as a whole. Nobody is asking that the food, shelter, entertaining and reading material of the student should be paid by anybody but himself or his family, just that the state pays the bills of the teachers and the university to ensure free access and not charging the student with an EXTRA bill precisely when he is young and lacks acreditation for good jobs. Doing otherwise is horribly classist, as those with rich families can get the same without having making any effort.

Communism DOES NOT IMPLY the elimination of private property. THe fact that most historical communisms had fall into des-humanized collectivism is the blame of Stalin and Mao and hardly a result of the ideology. Marx just spoke about the elimination of the PRODUCTION MEANS PRIVATE PROPERTY, and even this was rendered unnecessary by the theorists-practitioners of communist theories of 1900-1920. Check out the NEP plans that Lenin intended to establish before he died from overwork, and Stalin took power and cancelled all those plans. In Lenin design, all consumerīs goods manufacture and MOST economical activities would meant to be re-transferred to the private sector. The only sectors that should be kept under the State power are those with a STRONG tendency to monopoly, a phenomenon that in fact cancels all the advantages that capitalism brings to society: competence and freedom of market choice for starters. This includes Energy, Long-range Transportation, Credit Control, Natural resources exploitation and the like. Also, State should GUARANTEE equal health care and education access for everyone, but that does not mean that private sector cannot eventually operate on these: in fact, state should work on these to set standards and prevent the business to overthrow the SOCIAL FUNCTION that is MUCH MORE IMPORTANT. THe same is true for all economical activity: State should only regulate the workers market, ensuring good salaries with equal participation in profits, but should not put any other bureacratic or tax impediment on economical activities. DO you all communist haters know that communist states virtually did not put any taxes over home property and the like? now THATS economical freedom, and must be ensured. I would go as far as to eliminate taxes completely: state should support itself with the wealth from those sectors that it controls.

Also, all this joke about the 100 million deaths, dont you think that the number is a bit inflated? how the hell you arrive to it? are you sure that its not a BLATANT LIE to just put communism above NAZI-FASCISM and CHRISTIANISM that are REALLY the two ideologies that killed more people in history?

By the way, POl-Pot was no communist. THere was not a single trace of marxist-leninist theory in his plan. He was just an agrarian romantic utopysts, but with no real socialist or communist element; the "confusion" comes because he was somewhat a heir of Maoism that was ALSO an agrarian romantic utopia, but Maoism has marxist-leninist elements that Khmer Rough lacked completely. Also, PLEASE DONT FORGET that Khmer Roughe was SUPPORTED by USA (not openly, clearly, and they then declared that they "didnt knew" what kind of monster he was) in order to put a conter-weight to Vietnam, and that was Vietnam and ONLY Vietnam who destroyed its power in Cambodia. The International intervention after 1991 was done when all the hard work was already done.
Reply
:iconemperor-sama:
Emperor-sama Featured By Owner May 3, 2013
To tell the truth I support North Korea, China, and Cuba.
Reply
:iconvertigeaux:
vertigeaux Featured By Owner Feb 20, 2011
So fucking true. American factory-style school ruined my childhood.
Reply
:iconmarxistavi94:
marxistavi94 Featured By Owner Aug 6, 2010
All the shit said about stalin were blantant lies frm biased sources like randolph hearst and conquest. The numebrs simply dont add up, the soviet union was prosperous under stalin and rapidly advanced into the modern world. People were allowed to openly debate their views against stalin and stalin himself didn't want to come to power , but only did because he was voted 3 times 74,000 to 4,000. Also China is NOT a socialist country , it's state capitalist, there has never been a communist country, since no country has been stateless and classless. Why not read another view of stalin by ludo martens or fraud ,famine,and facism by douglas trottle. Do u ever actually evaluate the sources about stalin that claim he was brutal leader?
Reply
:icongoodwillambassador:
GoodwillAmbassador Featured By Owner Jul 26, 2010
\m/
Reply
:iconakaishizuku:
AkaiShizuku Featured By Owner Aug 8, 2009  Hobbyist Writer
Very well-done, comrade.

You're from Spain? I'm Spanish too, man! Well, only a quarter, but whatever. Nice work with the debates too, I've been on this forum arguing about it for literally days, tired as hell.
Reply
:icondelatorre-politik:
delatorre-politik Featured By Owner Jul 26, 2010
Yes I am.
Reply
:iconvietfox:
Vietfox Featured By Owner Aug 5, 2009
The funnny fact is that American teachers aren't allowed to talk or teach about communism until the late 90s. Communism is only an idea and not threatening. It's not like the world is going to burn under communism. In fact, communism is a good thing when applied properly. For example, China has set up regional communsit governments so that the central government doesn't have to carry the burden. And it's possible to have a free economy under communism. I think it's great because the government can control big things like investments so that when a recession happens, no one will get laid off.
Reply
:iconvilerage:
vilerage Featured By Owner Mar 12, 2009
I hate how Communists are always labeled wrong! Capitalists have their beliefs, you have yours. LEAVE THEM ALONE WALL STREET!
Reply
:iconmissushow:
MissusHow Featured By Owner Jun 25, 2008  Student Artist
Goodness gracious. Communism = education?

I don't think so. I don't think Democracy = education either, but oh dear this is quite a silly statement.
Reply
:iconoomandudeoo:
oOMandudeOo Featured By Owner Jan 20, 2008  Hobbyist Digital Artist
In America, public schooling is free. If you work hard, you can get scholarships to pay your way through college. Ultimately, you can become whatever you want with considerably little expenses.

I agree that education is a right - but so is personal liberty and freedom. Telling someone that they're exactly the same as everyone else and not giving them the power to change that is a crime to humanity.
Reply
:iconsubbie-overlord:
Subbie-Overlord Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2007
Communist? That's too bad
Reply
:icondelatorre-politik:
delatorre-politik Featured By Owner Aug 29, 2007
Yeah, we are always the bad guys. Free education and health care is a bad thing to ask for.

Maybe US considers that I should be in Guantanamo for though like this.
Reply
:iconsubbie-overlord:
Subbie-Overlord Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2007
In the long run, free health care will be a bad thing
Reply
:icondelatorre-politik:
delatorre-politik Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2007
Who says that? People who has a good insurance. (Because all the millions that doesn't have a good insurance doesn't think like that). France, Germany, Sweden... Do they have a bad healthcare?

Maybe they don't have five plasma TV in every room of the hospitals, but they have the same doctors for all the population. :)
Reply
:iconsubbie-overlord:
Subbie-Overlord Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2007
Hey! Communism has only killed 100 Million people! Let's give it another try!
Reply
:iconswemu:
SweMu Featured By Owner Jul 26, 2010  Professional General Artist
And capitalism hasnt? How about every war the US has been in after WW2. And what happened to all the native americans in the 16th-19th centuries? Did they die of old age in a cosy retirement home? No?
Reply
:iconcomradeking:
comradeKING Featured By Owner Aug 21, 2008
i love the way you make a random punch then cant even back it up.

so wait.. you would rather pay hundreds of dollars into an insurance company who, when you get ill, try as hard as they can to not help you?
you would rather have a system of health which actually does not care for their customers at all but looks at profit figures, not lives saved, as a way of charting success..?

also, many lives were lost not because of communism. but because of people like stalin who worked their way to power through trickery and deception then killed to stay there. communism doesnt kill. corrupt leaders kill.


communism is still thriving in every country
Reply
:iconsubbie-overlord:
Subbie-Overlord Featured By Owner Aug 23, 2008
I believe you can look at the current olympics and see that China is not very well off. No Free Speech. Breaking rules whenever the government sees fit. That country is not free.
Reply
:iconcomradeking:
comradeKING Featured By Owner Aug 24, 2008
its freer than western society where corporations turn blind eyes to their people and look only to profit. where religion is used as a way of supressing people and keeping them ignorant.

i dont know which olympics you were watching, the one i saw was spectacular. the people of china put on an amazing performance. a show of their ability and that they are a key power in the world.
look at cuba.. they have an amazingly prosperous society.

luckily where i am: in the UK, are society is completely engulfed with capitalism and we have a national health service. it isnt always smooth sailing but it means that everyone in the country gets equal care and attention.

i would ratehr have this than live in a country like the US where you have to pay a company to look after you and if you dont have enough, you cant get treatment. A country where instead of striving for better ways to treat patients, they look to how they can deny their patients any help so that they can squeeze every cent into their fat wallets.
Reply
(1 Reply)
:icondelatorre-politik:
delatorre-politik Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2007
America has invaded half-word. Maybe this half word can think the same... Let's give it another try!
Reply
:icondelatorre-politik:
delatorre-politik Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2007
Ask to El Salvador, Nicaragua, Venezuela, Somalia, Irak and a big etc... About the free world.
Reply
:icondelatorre-politik:
delatorre-politik Featured By Owner Aug 30, 2007
That's a falacy. Communism is a huge ideology. Communism is from the near-anarchism to pol-pot.

You are an american and you have the prejudice of the cold war. The commies the bad ones. I can understand you, but you have to understand that in countries like mine (Spain) and much others (Portugal, France, Italy, Greece...) communists were the main fighters for freedom and democracy.

The only opposition to Franco's dictatorship (Spain 1939-1975) was the Communist Party of Spain. That's why United States didn't matter if my country had a dictatorship, so they support it, they build up militar bases so... They collaborated with our old dictatorship. In the universities, the factories and much more places the opposition to that fascist dictatorship were communist. The first poster of the elections of the party was "Freedom and Socialism". They took part in the writting of the constitution that today has Spain. Do they kill anyone? No. Franco's regime killed thousands of communists. But they were with the good ones, withe the americans.

In Portugal the same... Democracy came with the revolution of claveles, communists militars end up with Salazar dictatorship. What did the US and the "good countries who doesn't kill millions of people" did then? ANYTHING.
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×




Details

Submitted on
August 29, 2007
Image Size
95.0 KB
Resolution
429×600
Link
Thumb
Embed

Stats

Views
3,916
Favourites
24 (who?)
Comments
30
Downloads
90

License

Creative Commons License
Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.
×